{"id":6595,"date":"2026-06-11T18:28:44","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T18:28:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=6595"},"modified":"2026-06-12T13:47:54","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T13:47:54","slug":"eurasias-eu-dream-now-comes-with-an-anti-russian-price-tag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/11\/eurasias-eu-dream-now-comes-with-an-anti-russian-price-tag\/","title":{"rendered":"Eurasia\u2019s EU dream now comes with an anti-Russian price tag"},"content":{"rendered":"
As Yerevan weighs Russia against Europe, the real question is whether the \u201cEuropean path\u201d exists at all<\/strong><\/p>\n The final results of Armenia\u2019s parliamentary elections are due to be announced this weekend. Vaagn Hovakimyan, head of the country\u2019s Central Election Commission, has said ballots will be recounted until Friday, after which complaints and appeals will be considered. The official results are expected on Sunday and those who reject the outcome will then have one day, June 19, to appeal to the Constitutional Court. \u201cFurther action will then be dictated by the court,\u201d<\/em> Hovakimyan said.<\/p>\n Narek Karapetyan, leader of the Strong Armenia electoral list, has said his movement will decide on its next steps once it is clear whether another opposition force, Prosperous Armenia, led by businessman Gagik Tsarukyan, has entered parliament. At present, it appears to have fallen short of the 4% threshold. The opposition Armenia bloc has already said it is ready to challenge the result.<\/p>\n The vote brought to a close a peculiar election campaign. Its oddity didn\u2019t lie in the use of administrative resources, including pressure on opponents, nor in the visible influence of external factors, because such things are now common almost everywhere. The unusual feature was the central narrative of the political struggle, where the campaign was presented as a choice between Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union on one side, and the West and the European Union on the other.<\/p>\n However, this is a phantom choice.<\/p>\n As far as Russia is concerned, it is, of course, for the Armenian people and their elected authorities to decide what kind of relationship they want with Moscow. Friendship cannot be imposed, and if a country wishes to go its own way, then so be it. This time, however, Moscow has made clear from the outset what Yerevan stands to lose if it chooses that path and the intention is obvious: Armenia should make its decision with full knowledge of the consequences.<\/p>\n The EU side of the equation is less clear because the problem is simple: no one has invited Armenia to join the bloc. At least, not in any serious form.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n In the case of Ukraine and Moldova, the prospect of eventual membership has at least hovered in the background since the 2010s, even if it has only recently become a formal process and still comes without guarantees. With Armenia, there has been nothing comparable, so to mistake Emmanuel Macron\u2019s warm embraces, or even the gradual expansion of military-technical cooperation, for an EU membership invitation would be extremely rash.<\/p>\n Nevertheless, the question of \u201cEAEU or EU\u201d<\/em> became the central theme of the current dispute. Russia contributed to this, in part, by putting future relations in the stark terms of choose now. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has been much more evasive, and his line is that Armenia is not leaving anything, remains involved in Eurasian integration, and will continue to do so until there is clarity on EU prospects. In other words, as soon as Brussels gives the signal, Armenia will move in that direction, but until then, everything should remain as it is, because the current arrangement remains useful.<\/p>\n Pashinyan\u2019s tactics, and those of his party, deserve a separate analysis, but the more interesting question is broader. How does the EU, now burdened by enormous internal problems and drawn into a large military-political crisis, remain such a powerful magnet for neighboring societies?<\/p>\n After the end of the Cold War, EU integration became one of the most successful political projects in modern European history. It came to be seen, if not as a blueprint for the whole world, then at least as a model to be extended across neighboring regions of Europe and Eurasia. The EU\u2019s achievements were obvious, in that if offered economic and political stability, high living standards, social protections, and an attractive image of the future.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The idea of non-violent expansion through the spread of rules and norms believed to be universally beneficial gave people in neighboring countries hope for change at home. This mattered greatly in Central and Eastern Europe, and across Eurasia, where public trust in domestic authorities has historically been low.<\/p>\n That perception has proved remarkably durable even though the European Union of the late 2020s bears little resemblance to the idealized image of a quarter-century ago: that image continues to work. For Brussels, the reputation of the EU as a successful, attractive and forward-looking union is not merely a pleasant accessory, it\u2019s an instrument of influence. It has helped the EU pursue its own development goals and shape the political choices of states around it.<\/p>\n Today, amid growing internal and external crises, this instrument is even more important. But the question for countries drawn into Brussel\u2019s orbit is whether the old assumptions still apply.<\/p>\n The successes of European integration in the second half of the twentieth century and in the early years of this century weren\u2019t simply the result of the wisdom and talent of the project\u2019s architects. Above all, they were the product of a unique historical moment, the aftermath of the Second World War, the structure of the Cold War, American patronage, the Soviet threat, and then the unexpected gift of the Soviet collapse, which produced an enormous political and economic \u201cpeace dividend.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n
