{"id":5687,"date":"2026-04-30T22:40:52","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T22:40:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=5687"},"modified":"2026-05-15T19:39:09","modified_gmt":"2026-05-15T19:39:09","slug":"a-deal-without-ukraine-inside-the-putin-trump-talks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2026\/04\/30\/a-deal-without-ukraine-inside-the-putin-trump-talks\/","title":{"rendered":"A deal without Ukraine: Inside the Putin-Trump talks"},"content":{"rendered":"
From the \u201cSpirit of Anchorage\u201d to sanctions shifts, Moscow and Washington are exploring a cautious thaw<\/strong><\/p>\n Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump have held another phone call. It was their 11th telephone conversation since February 2025.<\/p>\n Below, we explore what lies behind the official statements, why these conversations matter, and what US-Russia relations look like after 15 months of Trump\u2019s presidency.<\/p>\n Last summer, a new term entered the political lexicon of Kremlin spokespersons:\u00a0\u201cthe spirit of Anchorage.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0Formally, this refers to the list of verbal agreements reached during the historic meeting in Alaska regarding the principles for resolving the Ukraine crisis.<\/p>\n During that meeting, Trump dropped his demand for an immediate ceasefire, while Putin agreed to a ceasefire after the complete withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donetsk and Lugansk regions. This set a trap for Ukraine\u2019s Vladimir Zelensky and allowed Putin to continue the military operation.<\/p>\n Moscow, however, sees the issue from a broader perspective. Following the start of Russia\u2019s military operation in 2022, the attention of the whole world turned to Ukraine. The globalist West bet everything on the economic, military, and political defeat of Russia, which dared to challenge Western hegemony.<\/p>\n Trump has little regard for the unified West or the globalists. Thus, the Kremlin\u2019s strategic goal is to separate Russia-US relations from Russia-Ukraine relations (and by extension, Russia-EU relations), thereby dismantling the unified anti-Russia coalition.\u00a0<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n It would be best to achieve this while Trump is still in office. The future of American politics is unpredictable, but the chance of rallying a new unified anti-Russia front is minimal. Therefore, it\u2019s essential to break this coalition now.\u00a0<\/p>\n This scenario would effectively pull the US out of the conflict. Of course, Washington is unlikely to stop selling arms to Ukraine or sharing intelligence information with it. However, if there is a \u2018thaw\u2019 in economic and political ties, the conflict would cease to be existential; it would become part of a great game in which the US provides certain support for Ukraine and Russia does the same for Iran, but both sides continue to negotiate and find common ground. Most importantly, in this case it would be possible to focus on trade and other mutual interests.\u00a0<\/p>\n This situation would benefit both parties, since Moscow and Washington both need to balance their relationship with Beijing. This doesn\u2019t mean Russia will turn its back on China (that\u2019s not even on the table), but at least a partial restoration of economic ties with the US would give Russia more maneuverability in its relationship with China, and vice versa. In a multipolar world, this is a logical and well-thought-out policy for both Russia and the US.\u00a0<\/p>\n For now, this is hard to achieve \u2013 mainly because Trump faces fierce internal opposition, including within his own administration. For the past 80 years, Russia has been the main boogeyman for the US, and changing that mindset won\u2019t be easy. As a result, practically nothing has been accomplished over the past year \u2013 even issues that seemed settled last spring, like the mutual restoration of embassy operations, remain unresolved.<\/p>\nThe spirit of Anchorage<\/h2>\n

Separating the good from the bad<\/h2>\n