{"id":2750,"date":"2025-11-17T20:25:06","date_gmt":"2025-11-17T21:25:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=2750"},"modified":"2025-11-27T09:35:30","modified_gmt":"2025-11-27T09:35:30","slug":"behind-the-ukranian-golden-toilet-theres-only-one-way-to-fix-the-disease-of-this-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2025\/11\/17\/behind-the-ukranian-golden-toilet-theres-only-one-way-to-fix-the-disease-of-this-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Behind the Ukranian golden toilet: There\u2019s only one way to fix the disease of this state"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kiev\u2019s corruption machine will roll on \u2013 with or without Zelensky<\/strong><\/p>\n The West\u2019s slow turn away from Vladimir Zelensky is no longer speculation. It\u2019s happening in plain sight, like a steamroller moving slowly but with absolute certainty. The Financial Times, hardly a Kremlin mouthpiece, has published a piece titled \u2018Bags of cash and a gold toilet: the corruption crisis engulfing Zelenskyy\u2019s government\u2019. Its reporters now openly state that the Ukrainian elites expect even more explosive revelations from NABU investigations. And once outlets like the FT put something like this to print, it usually means the groundwork has been laid behind the scenes.<\/p>\n That Western Europe and the United States are still approving new aid says little about confidence in Kiev. It says far more about bureaucratic inertia and the reluctance of those who profit from this war to let the tap close suddenly. Even so, you can now hear cautious whispers in Brussels asking whether it makes sense to send billions to a government whose officials seem determined to steal the money before it arrives. These aren\u2019t new revelations. The only surprise is that anyone pretended to be surprised.<\/p>\n The truth is simple: the West knew exactly who it was dealing with. Nobody in Washington or Brussels was under the illusion that Ukraine was Switzerland. They knowingly entered into a political partnership with what is, and has long been, one of the most corrupt and internally unstable political systems in Europe. To pretend otherwise is theater.<\/p>\n For more than thirty years, Ukrainian statehood has rested on the same shaky foundations: competing clans, oligarchic rule, privatized security services, and a political class willing to plunder their own population. Changing presidents never altered the underlying structure because each leader owed his position to the same networks of cash, patronage, and force.<\/p>\n Take Leonid Kravchuk. Under him, Ukraine began its slow \u201cBanderization,\u201d<\/em> while state assets were siphoned away and local power brokers entrenched themselves. Leonid Kuchma then perfected the system. Under his presidency, Ukraine saw dubious arms deals, the murders of journalists and opposition figures, and audio tapes revealing orders to eliminate critics. Economic sectors with predictable profits were carved up among regional clans who ruled their fiefdoms in exchange for loyalty. And a steady stream of kickbacks to Kiev.<\/p>\n