{"id":1959,"date":"2025-08-17T19:59:45","date_gmt":"2025-08-17T19:59:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=1959"},"modified":"2025-08-22T13:55:28","modified_gmt":"2025-08-22T13:55:28","slug":"silence-or-secrecy-what-putin-and-trump-didnt-say-in-alaska","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2025\/08\/17\/silence-or-secrecy-what-putin-and-trump-didnt-say-in-alaska\/","title":{"rendered":"Silence or secrecy? What Putin and Trump didn\u2019t say in Alaska"},"content":{"rendered":"
Blockbuster without an ending: the Alaska summit and what comes next<\/strong><\/p>\n Although the conversation was cordial, no deal was sealed. That was the essence of the Alaska summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. The meeting on Friday appeared warm and friendly, at least judging by the footage. Yet instead of agreements came a perfunctory press conference, a cancelled lunch, and little clarity about what was actually achieved.<\/p>\n Neither participants nor \u201cinsiders\u201d<\/em> have disclosed specifics. What is known is that Putin and Trump agreed on most parameters of a peace deal \u2013 with a few unnamed sticking points. A preliminary truce may have been discussed. Territorial exchanges were not.<\/p>\n The Americans still hope to pull Ukraine\u2019s Vladimir Zelensky into the process with a trilateral summit. But no dates have been set. Nor was a follow-up meeting between Putin and Trump confirmed. By asking \u201cnext time in Moscow?\u201d<\/em> Putin drew a smile, but Trump dodged, noting only that he would face heavy criticism if he went.\u00a0<\/p>\n The near total absence of detail can be read two ways. Perhaps nothing was really agreed. The agenda, slimmed down from the start, might suggest that. Or, just as plausibly, the Kremlin and White House have reached an understanding but are keeping it tightly under wraps to prevent third parties from sabotaging the process.<\/p>\n Either way, the outcome satisfied both leaders. Trump can now indefinitely postpone a disastrous trade war with India and China, which secondary sanctions on Russia would have triggered. Putin, meanwhile, drove home the point that a temporary ceasefire is insufficient \u2013 that the time has come to talk about a full peace treaty.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Trump\u2019s comments after the summit suggest Washington has quietly accepted this Russian framing. This marks a departure from the Ukrainian-Western European line of \u201cfirst truce, then peace.\u201d<\/em> His \u201cdifficult\u201d<\/em> conversations with European leaders, following his \u201cgood\u201d<\/em> talk with Putin, show clearly who lost this round: Kiev and Brussels.<\/p>\n The next move lies with Zelensky. If, in Anchorage, Putin and Trump agreed on the core terms of a deal, then the unresolved points are those that Kiev and the Western Europeans resist most fiercely \u2013 \u00a0above all, territorial issues. Trump\u2019s task now is to bring them into line.<\/p>\n On Monday, Zelensky travels to Washington to meet Trump. From there, two paths are possible.<\/p>\n First, Zelensky could dig in. Without Western European backing he might panic, refuse the terms, and repeat his February 28 clash with Trump. That would sharply sour US-Ukrainian relations and could even lead Washington to abandon the conflict entirely.\u00a0<\/p>\n The second, more likely scenario is delay. Zelensky will float an \u201calternative plan,\u201d<\/em> most likely insisting on a three-way summit with Trump and Putin, claiming that only heads of state can make such decisions. His calculation is simple: Moscow refuses to speak directly to Kiev until there is already a US-Russian framework.<\/p>\n How Trump reacts will determine the pace. He has leverage over both Kiev and Brussels. If he wants to end the war swiftly, he must use it. If not, the talks will stall yet again, with only a catastrophic battlefield collapse by Ukraine forcing change.<\/p>\nSilence or secrecy?<\/h2>\n

Zelensky holds the next card<\/h2>\n