{"id":1224,"date":"2025-08-05T20:53:36","date_gmt":"2025-08-05T20:53:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=1224"},"modified":"2025-08-08T13:50:34","modified_gmt":"2025-08-08T13:50:34","slug":"russia-is-bringing-missiles-back-and-this-time-its-personal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2025\/08\/05\/russia-is-bringing-missiles-back-and-this-time-its-personal\/","title":{"rendered":"Russia is bringing missiles back. And this time, it\u2019s personal"},"content":{"rendered":"
With the US deploying intermediate-range systems in Europe and Asia, Russia says it\u2019s done waiting \u2013 and begins reshaping its own arsenal<\/strong><\/p>\n On August 4, the Russian Foreign Ministry announced that Moscow is abandoning its unilateral moratorium on the deployment of ground-based intermediate- and shorter-range missiles (INF-class). The decision comes amid what Russian officials describe as an ongoing expansion of US missile systems in Europe and the Indo-Pacific, including weapons once banned under the now-defunct INF Treaty.<\/p>\n The US has begun placing such systems in key regions on a potentially permanent basis, undermining strategic stability and creating a direct threat to Russia\u2019s national security. Moscow is preparing military-technical countermeasures in response \u2013 and is now lifting all political constraints on the development and deployment of such systems.<\/p>\n RT examines the situation through the lens of leading Russian military experts, who describe the move as long-anticipated, technically overdue, and strategically inevitable. Their assessments shed light on Moscow\u2019s doctrinal shift, future deployment options, and the broader geopolitical implications for Europe and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.<\/p>\n Moscow had shown restraint for several years after the US withdrew from the INF Treaty in 2019. Although legally freed from its obligations under the accord, Russia opted for a self-imposed moratorium, vowing not to deploy ground-based intermediate-range missiles unless similar US systems appeared near its borders.<\/p>\n That condition, the Ministry statement asserts, no longer applies.<\/p>\n \u201cSince 2023, we have observed instances of US systems capable of ground-launched INF strikes being transferred to the European NATO countries for trial use during exercises that clearly have an anti-Russian slant.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n It also pointed to broader US and allied efforts to institutionalize deployments of such missile systems across multiple theaters. Specific examples included:<\/p>\n The deployment of the Typhon missile launcher to the Philippines under the guise of drills, with the system remaining in place even after exercises concluded;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Tests of the PrSM missile in Australia during 2025 exercises \u2013 with its future variants projected to exceed 1,000 km in range;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n The planned deployment of SM-6 interceptors in Germany by 2026, launched from the same Typhon system.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Russia views these developments as \u201cdestabilizing missile buildups\u201d<\/em> that threaten its national security \u201cat the strategic level.\u201d<\/em> The Foreign Ministry stated that Moscow will now undertake \u201cmilitary-technical response measures\u201d<\/em>, with the precise configuration to be determined by the Russian leadership based on inter-agency analysis and the evolving strategic environment.<\/p>\n Officials also referenced an earlier warning issued in June 2025, when Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said that Russia\u2019s moratorium was approaching its \u201clogical conclusion\u201d<\/em> in light of \u201csensitive missile threats\u201d<\/em> being fielded by the West.<\/p>\n While Russia\u2019s announcement marks a formal policy shift, experts argue that the conditions for abandoning the moratorium have been building for years \u2013 largely due to developments on the US side.<\/p>\n According to military analyst Ilya Kramnik, a research fellow at the Center for Strategic Planning Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences, the deployment of INF-class systems by the United States and its allies has made Russia\u2019s restraint functionally obsolete.<\/p>\n \u201cIn principle, Russia has long had reason to consider itself free from any INF-related constraints,\u201d<\/em> he notes. \u201cBut this week\u2019s statement appears to be synchronized with the start of deliveries of the Oreshnik missile system to the armed forces.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The US began laying the groundwork for forward deployment of ground-based missiles as early as 2021, when it launched the formation of Multi-Domain Task Forces (MDTFs) \u2013 mobile army units designed to integrate long-range fires, precision strike, and battlefield networking. These units were to be equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles using the Typhon launcher, a land-based containerized system derived from the naval Mk.41 vertical launch platform.<\/p>\n \u201cThe second such group, the 2nd MDTF, was formed in Germany,\u201d<\/em> Kramnik explains, \u201cwith a clear orientation toward the European theater.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n Meanwhile, the Typhon has been actively deployed in the Indo-Pacific, most notably to the Philippines, where it arrived during bilateral exercises but was not withdrawn. The US has also resumed tests of the PrSM missile in Australia \u2013 a platform that, in its future iterations, is expected to exceed a 1,000-km range, placing it well within INF classification.<\/p>\n Plans for SM-6 missile deployment in Germany by 2026 \u2013 also via the Typhon system \u2013 further contributed to Russian concerns. Although originally designed as a naval interceptor, the SM-6 has evolved into a multi-role weapon with conventional strike capability.<\/p>\n Taken together, these moves have prompted Russian officials to conclude that the United States is pursuing a strategy of \u201csustained forward missile presence\u201d<\/em> across both Europe and Asia \u2013 effectively restoring the kind of reach that the INF Treaty once prohibited.<\/p>\nWhat the Foreign Ministry said: Russia\u2019s rationale<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
The triggers<\/h2>\n